Dr. Jekell And Mr. Hyde :: essays research papers

The Dominion of Evil The term Jekyll and Hyde, now a part of our uncouth language, can be found in most dictionaries. Random dictionary definitions of Jekyll and Hyde include 1) One who has quasi-schizophrenic, alternating phases of pleasantness an unpleasantness. 2) A person having a tell personality, one side of which is good and the other evil. 3) This phrase refers to a person who alternates between charming demeanor and extremely unpleasant behavior. This concept revolves around the induce of Dr. Jekyll, enabled by drinking a potion, into living as his own living side, whom he names Hyde. Stevenson intended Jekylls character to be pronounced Je (French name for I) Kill (Je-Kill = I kill), as an indication that the doctor wanted to isolate the evil portion of himself, appropriately named Hyde, meaning low and vulgar dissemble or flesh which must hide from civilization. When Robert Louis Stevenson wrote the story Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, he portrayed mans evil nature as a por tion of his chalk up makeup, and showed that the evil portion will often express itself more forcefully and powerfully than do the other aspects. Throughout disembodied spirit, a person can germinate a sense of the conflict that actually involves ones good and evil natures. Often a persons current actions reflect their childishness experiences. Jekyll, described by Stevenson, born wealthy, grew up handsome, honorable, and distinguished. Yet, throughout much of his life, he commits secret acts which he thoroughly regrets. Early in Jekylls development, Stevenson had him recognize a profound duplicity of life...so profound a double dealer and that man is not truly one, but truly two. Intellectually, he evaluates the differences between his private life and his public life and, ultimately, he becomes obsessed with the idea that at least two different entities, maybe even more, occupy a person. Jekylls reflections and his scientific knowledge lead him to contemplate the possibility o f scientifically isolating these two components. With this in mind, he begins to experiment with various chemical combinations. When Jekyll discovers the correct formula and drinks it, he is approaching a hardy fifty years of age after his transformation into Edward Hyde, he feels younger, lighter, and more sensual, thereby indicating the appeal of the evil side. At that point, he acknowledges the thorough and primitive duality of man. He sees the necessity to try to separate the two selves, to hide that shameful part of himself from the world, and therefore stay in find out of his evil nature.

Technology Ethic: Stem Cells Essay -- Research Science Biology Essays

Technology Ethic bowknot prison cellsStem CellStem cells can be opinion of as blank slates or cells that have yet to become specialized. They can be transformed to become cells with special functions. History/Background of Stem CellsIn the mid 1960s, R. G. Edwards and colleagues at Cambridge University began studying differentiation of rabbit embryonic cells in an artificial environment. They manipulated these embryonic cells into specific types of form such as connective create from raw material and muscle neurons. Richard Gardner, a graduate student of R. G. Edwards, had furthered the experiment with mice blastocoels. As a result, human blast cysts became available since R. G. Edwards laboratory in the early 1980s.In 1986, light beam Hollands, another graduate student of Edwards, demonstrated that mouse embryonic stem cells could colonize and repair damaged tissues of the haematopoietic system in adult mice. In 1998, James Thomson and colleagues at the University of Wiscons in successfully isolated and grew human embryonic stem cells. At John Hopkins University, John Gearhart successfully isolated human germ cells.From 1999 to two hundred0, questioners go along to manipulated cells from adult mouse tissues. Types Of Stem Cells Stem cells can be classified into tree main typesoEmbryonic Stem (ES) CellsoEmbryonic Germ (EG) Cells oAdult Stem (AS) CellsEmbryonic Stem CellES cells are undifferentiated cells derived from the inner cell mass of the blast cyst. They are the original cells of our body tissues. ES cells have the potential to transform into 200 different specialized cell types. Human embryonic stem cells are derived from fertilized embryos which are less than a week old. In November of... ...ind. A young muliebrity paralyzed in a car accident now can move her legs and toes as a result of having her own immune system cells injected into her spinal anesthesia cord. Two children born without immune systems now have functioning ones becau se of a bone-marrow stem cell treatment. After analyzing stem cell development, I feel that research on ES cells should be stopped because of the many risks involved. Whereas the research on AS cells should carry on for it opposes no hazard to anyone.Referenceshttp//www.nih.gov/news/stemcell/primer.htm5http//www.news.wisc.edu/packages/stemcells/http//bioethics.gov/topics/stemcells_index.htmlhttp//www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/stemcell/Mahendra S. Rao, Stem Cells and CNS Development (Contemporary Neuroscience)Kursad Turksen, Embryonic Stem Cells Methods and ProtocolsDaniel R. Marshak, Stem Cell Biology

A True Hero Essay -- Definition Hero Heroes Essays Role Model

A True Hero As I read David Halberstams ideas in his essay, Who We Are (2004), I started thinking about our nations leaders and heroes. September 11th came to my mind and the many firefighters and rescue workers who heroi makey risked their lives to save complete strangers. Then, I remembered that the media dubbed Jessica lynch a hero when she came back to the United States. Not only Jessica, but also many other American soldiers fighting abroad are called heroes. I started wondering if their bravery actually makes them true heroes or not. I asked myself, what is a hero? Do people need heroes? Where does the tenet that we need heroes come from? This belief has caused us to over apply our use of the word to almost everyone leaders, firefighters, and even sports figures. Sometimes, those who we title heroes are merely good people in the right stupefy at the right time or are simply doing their jobs. Essentially, we shouldnt need heroes. Instead, we should seek role models and acknowl edge the everyday worker. However, the ultimate search for a hero should be within us. We all have the capacity to embrace our inner strength in order to lead our lives with courage and nobility.I. Archaic DefinitionsIn a US News & World Report special online issue about heroes, Clark (2001) gives several definitions of a hero heroes go above and beyond the call of duty, they champion a good cause, and (my favorite) they serve as a calling to our higher selves. In an online Answers dictionary, hero is defined as a person storied for feats of courage or nobility of purpose, especially one who has risked or sacrificed his or her life (2005). There is a song sung by Bonnie Tyler called dimension Out for a Hero in which a line is I n... ..., from http//www.yourdictionary.com/library/changed.html.Jordan, R. (1989). The quiet hero. Washington D.C. The Catholic University of America Press.Ruotolo, L. (1973). Six existential heroes the government of faith. Cambridge, MA Harvard Universi ty Press.Singh, Manjari-Lu, & Yu, Mei. (2003). Exploring the function of heroes and heroines in childrens literature from around the world. Retrieved Dec. 04, 2005, from http//www.ericdigests.org/2004-1/heroes.htm.Steinman, J. (2005). Bonnie tyler. Retrieved Dec. 11, 2005, from http//www.lyricscafe.com/t/tyler_bonnie/holding_out_for_a_hero.html.Think Exist Quotations, (2005). Quotes. Retrieved Dec. 06, 2005, from http//en.thinkexist.com/quotes/with/keyword/martyrs/.Warner, J. (2004). Do we need another sports hero?. Retrieved Dec. 04, 2005, from http//www.webmd.com/content/ denomination/93/102060.htm.

Lorraine Hansberrys A Raisin In The Sun :: essays research papers

The civil rights movement brought enlightenment towards the abolishment of segregation laws. Although the laws ar gone does segregation still exist in fact? &8220What happens to a dream deferred, does it dry up like a raisin in the sun? said, in a poem by Langston Huges. The story, A Raisin in the Sun, by Lorraine Hansberry showed segregation and its affects upon all races. This essay will show how Assimilationists and New Negroes fought for their own identity in the mid twentieth century. Whether they were be true to themselves or creating carbon copies of oppression was determined by one&8217s view upon society.Passivity only draw out sorrow against the battle against segregation. Mrs. Johnson in A Raisin in the Sun is passive to the actions taken upon her. In the story she acts like a strong person by saying, &8220Wilhelmina Othella Johnson does anything, whenever she wants While in reality she is weak individual. The United States during World War 2 were submissive towards Hi tler at first. This gave Hitler time to gain power and support of the people. If the Unites States had acted to begin with towards Hitler the war would&8217ve ended quickly. This is a similar paradox to Mrs. Johnson&8217s attitude towards segregation and racism in the story.Ignorance and propaganda were wide spread creating more and more assimilationists exponentially. racism caused African people to hate themselves and there culture. Through this misunderstanding Black people wore different styles of clothing, adapted different tones in speech, and different goals in life. Walter in A Raisin in the Sun by Hansberry, wanted to buy a liquor lineage because he hated being a servant for the bloodless man. In buying a liquor store he would create apathy and hate in the black community by the alcoholism that his store would create. Through Walters own financial success would be the failure of hundreds of others. Propaganda and Hatred towards the Jewish population left some Jews hatin g themselves. They thought that it was there fault for being Jewish and developed groups of anti-Semitic Jews, destroying the there own culture.The battle against racism was fought with the help of many people. Beneatha in the story, A Raisin in the Sun by Hansberry, was unceasingly trying to find herself within the story. Whether it would be the guitar lessons she would take or the clothes she would wear, it all meant something to her.

Connecting The Tempest, Of Cannibals, Eating Gifted Children, and Modest Proposal :: Tempest essays

Connection Between The Tempest, Of Cannibals, Eating Gifted Children, and  Modest Proposal   There are several, in-depth connections presented in The Tempest by William Shakespeare, Of Cannibals by Michel de Montaigne, How to Raise Your I.Q. by Eating Gifted Children by Lewis Frumkes, and A Modest Proposal by Jonathan Swift. While all these stories feature of speech civilization and the uncivilized coming into contact with one an otherwise, perhaps for the first time, they also feature a deeper connection. They feature a connection to each other that strikes to the very heart and structure of our civilizations today-just as it did when these works were written. That connection is the idea that the noble savage (if there is such a thing) is appalled at what we bring up civilization because of how unjust, uncaring, and unkind we are to one another. The works point out how the savage perhaps is just the innocent and we are the ones who ought to be called savages-not because of what our culture does, still what it does not do.   We do not care for one another in todays confederacy. The culture weve built ourselves is one where each man strives for his own good. Each person cares and looks out for Number One. In the end, as stated by the savages in Montaignes essay, rich people can live in luxury on the similar street where poverty takes lives. In todays society of computerized and/or instant everything, we look about at the social troubles that plague us and seek solutions similar to those we down for mechanical problems. People who write laws do not care for the people they govern from the heart, but rather from the wallet. We implement measures that are quick fixes. They fix the speedy problem at hand or in the publics eye because thats what will get the politician re-elected. The very structure of our social care system is a laughable joke.   As Lewis Frumkes and Jonathan Swift point out in their respective satires, How to Raise Your I. Q. by Eating Gifted Children and A Modest Proposal, this society is one which looks for quickie solutions to every surface problem without actually looking into the causes. What Frumkes and Swift propose are not so far off from the commonplaceness which we ourselves would propose to deal with our social-economic problems. Do we not practice the eating of children for our individual gain in all but the literal sense?

Michael Collins’

Between the white knuckle intensity, the bombastic array of explosions, the sinister factionalism and the multitude of conspiratorial machinations, director Neil Jordans Michael collins comes discharge care semi governmental history re-imagined in the vein of the gangster film. As an ambitious attempt to chronicle the life and times of one of the most important figures in Irelands violent struggles for independence from the British Empire, it is intelligently well-made.But it is also problematic, because it makes an obscure political struggle even more obscure by trivializing it in the vogue that a lot of historical cinema has trivialized history emphasizing the emotional highs and lows of its protagonists at the expense of the events it uses as its foundation. Considering that Michael collins epochal content is funda workforcetally tied to relegate day conflicts, namely the seemingly endless one in Northern Ireland, this is rather troubling.Collins is credited with inventing g uerilla warfare, and bringing world attention to the Irish cause by forcing the English to cede authority in certain parts of his native soil and initiating a movement for an independent Irish republic. Having seen umteen historical dramas before, I immediately assumed that Jordan was going to spend the entire length of the film demonstrating Collins greatness. I was pleasantly surprised to see that charm Jordan does question some of Collins constituent attributes and decisions, he fashions a historical account that somehow absolves Collins of the present state of Ireland.Jordan presents Collins, played with hearty pizzaz by Academy Award nominee Liam Neeson, glo kick upstairsg from the residual acclaim of Schindlers List, as a patriot whose dedication to the annihilation of British conventionalism in Ireland was compromised by the people around him. The film opens with a terrible bombardment by the English upon Irish freedom fighters, which establishes the unforgiving demand o f loyalty that the English crown maintained without any pretense of subtlety.Some years later, one of them named Collins is released from jail, whereupon he proceeds to give impassioned speeches as the self-dubbed look of Mayhem. Collins argues that the disastrous defeat in 1916 proves that a straightforward battle against the occupying British presence is an invitation to defeat. He proposes that they plant bombs to deliver unobstructed carnage to those who would contend Irish independence.The film plays this up as an action of last resort in which Collins and his men have been forced to use furiousness because of the unyielding nature of the anti-independents. Yet despite to airing this sentiment frequently to his best friend/confidant/rival Harry Boland (as played by Aidan Quinn), Collins has no qualms about using the intelligence offered by a sympathetic copper played by the downtrodden hangdog face of The Crying Games Stephen Rea.The escalating acts of violence put the Bri tish in the uncomfortable position of acceding to negotiations, and former Republic president Eamon de Valera, as portrayed with vague menace by versatile character actor Alan Rickman, delegates Collins as a representative on his behalf. Collins recognizes his own shortcomings as a politico the best he could negotiate was self-governance for southeasterly Ireland with allegiance to the Crown still in place.It is this halfway point of reconciliation between Ireland and the Crown that Collins argues is the best attainable agreement of the time. De Valera proceeds to decouple himself from Collins, while Collins has a falling out with Boland, and the upset leads to civil war. Eventually, Collins dies at the hands of an assassin, which Jordan implies to have been approved by De Valera.Jordans Collins ultimately comes off as a violent underdog who repackages himself as a liaison between his countrymen and the occupying forces, trading in the downtrodden charisma of a scruffy brown coat with the sharp glamour of a well pressed uniform, not unlike a German officer who approves of Hitler because of the blessings in his life under Nazism.This isnt to say that Collins was some kind of fascist, but that his frequently celebrated talents for political expedience still fall short under the lens of fine examination. After all, his agitators approach to moving the Irish cause forward still hasnt brought mollification today.In the meantime, conventional history writes De Valera off as a duplicitous sell out, and Jordan doesnt attempt to challenge that view, choosing instead to portray Collins as a heroic patriot. This strikes me as strange, since Collins is the man who initiated violence and then insisted that violence must stop, leaving us with a rather ambiguous and maybe ambivalent definition of what heroism and patriotism is.Michael CollinsThis oft-quoted statement is a testament as to how diverse a societys perception of historical figures can be. Different world att ractors, particularly revolutionaries are often portrayed in different respects, according to the ideological prism one uses to analyze the life of the worlds greatest men and women. Mao Zedong, for example, will always be remembered by the majority of the Chinese population who lived through the years prior to the 1949 Chinese revolution as the leader of a peoples movement that liberated Chinese society from a semi-feudal and semi-colonial system ruled by bourgeois compradors and big landowners under the egis of foreign imperialism.He is also remembered by some sections of Chinese society as a ruthless dictator who insisted on an experimental utopian companionable system that led to the deaths of millions of his people due to hunger and famine. In contemporary history, on the other hand, Arab nationalists and anti-imperialists view the legacy of Saddam Hussein as a triumph of the repudiation of American intrusion into Arab soil, while American conservatives view his reign of ter ror as one of the most dastardly regimes the world has seen in the last fifty years. Nonetheless, it is this historical ambivalence that the life of Michael Collins as an Irish revolutionary shall be analyzed in this paper, especially on questions as to whether he can be considered a villain or a patriot.Michael Collins was an Irish revolutionary who fervently sought the independence of Ireland from the illegal business concern of England, and led one of the bloodiest armed struggles against the British Empire. Collins came to the fore during the easterly Rising, which was one of the first attempts for centuries of British rule that militant Irish republicans sought to win Irish independence by force of arms. It must be understood that the armed struggle which was started during the easter Rising and continued on even by the Irish Republican Army until recent past was a reaction to the timid parliamentary politics that was being espoused by the Irish Parliamentary party of John Redmond.This party was seen by many militant republicans led by Michael Collins as a capitulating force and utterly incapable of leading the Irish people in the path to independence. As such, the Easter Rising was hatched and implemented by throngs of Irish revolutionaries which sought to grab the reins of political power from the British in the lightning fashion of an urban insurrection by seizing buildings in Dublin and cordon-off the city to surmount a violent counter-attack from British security forces, however guerilla attacks at British soldiers a tactic that was mastered by Collins through his flying columns.As expected, the British forces soon after counter-attacked and they were resolutely able to quell the rebellion in a week, with the leading members and cadres of the Irish republican movement arrested and even executed by the British. This foolish tactic of political violence was premised on the theory that the bloodletting of the leaders and members of the republican movement would soon after inspire the struggle of a thousand-fold more people. mend this tactic of violence had a definite shock-value both to the British Empire and the Irish public, it was very costly to the Irish republican cause because it lost much of its respected leaders, especially John Connolly, the head of the Irish armed socialist movement that inspired much of the forces to wage armed struggle against the British Empire. In all of these, and even to the events leading to the signing of the Peace treaty between the Ireland and England, Michael Collins can be considered a patriot as he knew at what historic moment the necessity of armed struggle beckons, alongside his other comrades in the Irish republican movement.By supporting the armed struggle, no event how ill-advised their insurrectionary tactic was, Collins recognized that Irish political power and national sovereignty can never be attained by simply waging a peaceful parliamentary struggle against the British cro wn, as the Empire will never hand over sovereignty of rich Irish lands on a silver platter. Instead, it must be forcibly taken through violent means.Nonetheless, it is only in Collins role prior to the peace treaty that he can be considered a patriot as he capitulated to the might of the British Empire when he acceded to the treaty and abruptly cease hostilities between the warring nations. Many in the radical sections of the Irish Republican Army saw the signing of the treaty and Collins support for it as a betrayal of the Irish revolution, especially to the Irish martyrs who only wanted to witness an Ireland that had its people as its sovereign and not the English throne. For this, Collins was assassinated during the Irish Civil War, dying in the same violent manner as the armed struggle he valiantly espoused in the years after the Easter Rising.On the other hand, it can somehow be express that Collins model of political violence is comparable to the theory of armed struggle by Che Guevara, particularly his foco theory. Che Guevara believed that a single guerilla force, no matter how small, carrying out armed revolution in any country is capable of spreading like wildfire and inspiring the masses to join the revolution.Both of them believed in the necessity of guerilla warfare as the most effective tool at systematically minify the strength of the enemy, especially an enemy with almost unlimited military resources fighting against a revolutionary movement with meager resources. It must also be said that both revolutionary leaders repudiated the grabbing of political power through an urban insurrection as it opened revolutionary movement and its supporters to the heavy weight of a counter-attack by enemy forces which might be utter detrimental to the revolutionary cause.In all of these, though, it must be reiterated that despite the faults and failures of Michael Collins, especially when he capitulated to British forces instead of seeing the Irish revoluti on to its fruition, his life as an Irish patriot and hero can never be discounted. He lived at a concrete historical moment which challenged him and many other Irishmen to stand up against a mighty empire and determine their own destiny as a people.Works CitedCastaneda, J. (1998). Comandante The life and death of Ch Guevara. Vintage Publishing. Fox, R.M. (1943). The History of the Irish Citizen Army. Dublin James Duffy & Co. Hopkinson, M. Green Against Green, the Irish Civil War, pp.83-87 Kostick, Conor & Collins. (2000). The Easter Rising. Dublin OBrien Press Townshend, C. (2005). Easter 1916 the Irish rebellion. London Allen Lane.